5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
5. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General together with counsel for your complainant further argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led to the recovery of sleeping capsules on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has actually been manufactured before the Court wherein the sleeping pills were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected while in the liver although not within the abdomen. That's why, the recovery of claimed sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel for that complainant have also argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Bhoora led towards the recovery of the motorcycle.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is additionally a nicely-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.
Life imprisonment can be an alternative on the death penalty. In these kinds of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to spend the remainder of their natural life behind bars.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal suggestions or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case has become or will be filed.
extended period petitioner wasn't regarded as for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on more info charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty with the accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.
There are numerous circumstances where death was never supposed – even more where those nominated while in the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is usually a tragic event. However the death of any living being is no considerably less a tragic event.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the different reduced appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners could seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, will be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It consists of the execution of the convicted person to be a consequence of their crime.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be observed in the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any helpful purpose at this stage.”
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--